考研综合演练与答案详解4（集锦9篇）
【简介】感谢网友“七七田”参与投稿，下面是小编收集整理的考研综合演练与答案详解4（共9篇），供大家参考借鉴，欢迎大家分享。
篇1：考研综合演练与答案详解4
考研综合演练与答案详解（4）
Passage 4
When your secretary invited me to come here, she told me that your Society is concerned with the employment of women and she suggested that I might tell you something about my own professional experiences.
1) __________________________________________________. For the road was cut many years ago ――by Fanny Burney, by Aphra Behn, by Harriet Martineau, by Jane Austen, by George Eliot―― many famous women, and many more unknown and forgotten, have been before me, making the path smooth, and regulating my steps.
…… 此处隐藏32827字 ……
[C]has won support from influentials
[D]requires solid evidence for its validity
【正确选项解析】[D]由①可知这个理论是未经检验的(untested)，这就意味着“需要可靠的证据证明其有效性”(requires solid evidence for its validity)。所以本题是同义替换之正话反说。
【干扰选项分析】[A]与作者对该理论的反对态度矛盾。
[B] ③这个理论似乎(seems)可以解释某些流行的趋势，seem这个词表明作者其实是反对这个说法的。
[C]偷换概念，偷换了②中的marketer
①In their recent work, however, some researchers have come up with the finding that influentials have far less impact on social epidemics than is generally supposed. ② In fact, they don’t seem to be required of all. ③ The researchers’ argument stems from a simple observation about social influence, with the exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey ― whose outsize presence is primarily a function of media, not interpersonal, influence ― even the most influential members of a population simply don’t interact with that many others. ④Yet it is precisely these noncelebrity influentials who, according to the two-step-flow theory, are supposed to drive social epidemics by influencing their friends and colleagues directly. ⑤ For a social epidemic to occur, however, each person so affected, must then influence his or her own acquaintances, who must in turn influence theirs, and so on; ⑥and just how many others pay attention to each of these people has little to do with the initial influential. ⑦ If people in the network just two degrees removed from the initial influential prove resistant, for example, the cascade of change won’t propagate very far or affect many people。
【考点分析】①承上启下。研究者推翻了上文的错误观点。②无需看懂。③研究者的理由来自关于社会影响的简单的观察。即使最有影响力的人也不会与太多的人交流。④是two-step-flow theory理论。⑤转折常考出33题。“每一个受影响的人必须要影响他的熟人，他的熟人再影响自己的熟人”，这也就因为是social interaction。
